Login

Clinical Effectiveness of Individualized Occlusiographic Analysis in Restoring Occlusal Contacts in Patients with Pathological Tooth Wear

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): International Journal of Integrative and Modern Medicine:

M.T. Safarov (1)

(1) Scientific Supervisor, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Hospital Orthopedic Dentistry, Tashkent State Medical University, Uzbekistan, Uzbekistan
Fulltext View | Download

Abstract:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of individualized
occlusiographic analysis in restoring occlusal contacts in patients with pathological tooth wear affecting
molar teeth. A prospective clinical study was conducted involving patients diagnosed with pathological
tooth wear who required restorative treatment of posterior teeth. Individualized occlusiographic analysis
was performed at multiple stages of treatment to assess occlusal contact distribution, intensity, and
balance. Clinical outcomes were evaluated through comparative analysis of occlusal contact patterns
before and after restoration, as well as through functional and patient-centered parameters. The results
demonstrated a statistically and clinically significant improvement in the number, symmetry, and
stability of occlusal contacts following restorations guided by individualized occlusiographic analysis.
Post-treatment assessments revealed more uniform load distribution across molar regions, improved
occlusal balance, and enhanced functional adaptation. Patients also reported subjective improvements in
chewing comfort and overall satisfaction with treatment outcomes. The findings of this study confirm
that individualized occlusiographic analysis is an effective adjunct in the restorative management of
pathological tooth wear. Its application allows clinicians to tailor occlusal design to patient-specific
functional characteristics, thereby improving clinical outcomes and reducing the risk of secondary
complications. Incorporating individualized occlusiography into routine prosthodontic protocols may
contribute to more predictable and functionally stable restorative results in patients with pathological
tooth wear.

References

1. Abduo, J., & Lyons, K. (2012). Clinical considerations for increasing occlusal vertical dimension: A

review. Australian Dental Journal, 57(1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01640.x

2. Bartlett, D., Dugmore, C., & Pathan, S. (2003). Occlusal surfaces of unrestored teeth. Journal of

Dentistry, 31(8), 507–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00108-5

3. Dawson, P. E. (2007). Functional occlusion: From TMJ to smile design. Mosby Elsevier.

4. Ferrario, V. F., Sforza, C., Serrao, G., Dellavia, C., & Tartaglia, G. M. (2004). Single tooth bite forces

in healthy young adults. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 31(1), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305

182X.2003.01185.x

5. Gibbons, A. J., & Mackie, I. C. (1997). Occlusal splint therapy in the management of bruxism. British

Dental Journal, 182(6), 215–218. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809347

Journal

6. Johansson, A., Omar, R., & Carlsson, G. E. (2011). Bruxism and prosthetic treatment: A critical

review.

of

Prosthodontic

Research,

55(3),

127–136.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2011.02.004

7. Kelleher, M., & Bishop, K. (1999). Tooth surface loss: An overview. British Dental Journal, 186(2),

61–66. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800028

8. Lobbezoo, F., Ahlberg, J., Glaros, A. G., et al. (2013). Bruxism defined and graded: An international

consensus. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 40(1), 2–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12011

9. Manfredini, D., Poggio, C. E., Lobbezoo, F. (2014). Is bruxism a risk factor for dental implants?

Journal of Dental Research, 93(10), 843–848. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514544148

10. McNeill, C. (Ed.). (1997). Science and practice of occlusion. Quintessence Publishing.

11. Okeson, J. P. (2013). Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion (7th ed.). Mosby

Elsevier.

12. Palla, S. (2011). Occlusion and temporomandibular disorders. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 38(6),

405–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02166.x

13. Pérez-González, F., & López-Suárez, C. (2016). Occlusal force distribution analysis using

occlusiography. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 29(1), 60–66.

during

14. Pintado, M. R., Anderson, G. C., DeLong, R., & Douglas, W. H. (1997). Variation in tooth contact

patterns

chewing.

Journal

of

Prosthetic

Dentistry,

77(6),

583–591.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70138-5

15. Sarafov, M. T., & Olimjonova, N. O. (2024). Individualized occlusiographic analysis in restorative

dentistry: Clinical perspectives. Journal of Prosthodontic Dentistry, 68(2), 112–119.