The Role of Immunotherapy and Gene Therapy in The Treatment of Breast Cancer in Middle-Aged Women: Integration with Pathomorphological Markers and Organ-Preserving Surgery

Authors

  • Dadamukhamedova Khalida Erkinovna Tashkent State Medical University, Uzbekistan
  • Begimqulov Mirjalol Yashin ugli Tashkent State Medical University, Uzbekistan
  • Kuvondikova Zulfizar Jasurbek qizi Tashkent State Medical University, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31149/ijimm.v4i10.3015

Keywords:

Breast Cancer, Middle-Aged Women, Pathological Anatomy, Immunohistochemistry, HER2, ER, PR, Triple-Negative Breast Cancer, Pembrolizumab, Immunotherapy, Gene Therapy, P53, Oncoplastic Surgery, Breast-Conserving Surgery

Abstract

This article analyses modern, biologically targeted approaches to the treatment of breast cancer in middle-aged women. The main focus is on determining the pathomorphological and molecular characteristics of the tumour, the role of immunotherapy, particularly in triple-negative breast cancer, the current level of clinical research on gene therapy, and the possibilities for reducing the extent of surgery. In breast cancer, the choice of treatment is determined by the histological type and grade of the tumour, lymph node status, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2 status, proliferative activity and other biomarkers. Modern neoadjuvant systemic therapy, including pembrolizumab-based chemoimmunotherapy, increases the likelihood of a pathological complete response in certain early-stage triple-negative tumours and allows surgery to be individualised. Gene therapy encompasses such areas as p53, oncolytic viruses, immunomodulatory genes, siRNA/shRNA, gene editing and genetic vaccines; however, in breast cancer most of these approaches remain at the clinical research stage. The role of the pathologist is not limited to diagnosis but is also essential in assessing response to treatment and selecting subsequent therapy. Organ-preserving and oncoplastic surgery, in turn, makes it possible in suitable patients to reduce surgical trauma and functional and aesthetic losses while maintaining oncological control.

References

[1] World Health Organization, “Breast cancer,” WHO Fact Sheets, Jul. 3, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/breast-cancer

[2] National Cancer Institute, “Breast cancer treatment (PDQ®).” [Online]. Available: https://www.cancer.gov/types/breast/hp/breast-treatment-pdq

[3] National Cancer Institute, “Immunotherapy for breast cancer.” [Online]. Available: https://www.cancer.gov/types/breast/treatment/immunotherapy

[4] P. Schmid et al., “Overall survival with pembrolizumab in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 391, pp. 1981–1991, 2024, doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2409932.

[5] H. J. Burstein, “Immunotherapy for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 391, pp. 2048–2049, 2024, doi: 10.1056/NEJMe2411606.

[6] K. H. Allison et al., “Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: ASCO–CAP guideline update,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02864.

[7] S. Li, X. Li, D. Li et al., “A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy in terms of patient survival rate and quality of life in breast cancer,” International Journal for Quality in Health Care, vol. 36, no. 2, Art. no. mzae043, 2024, doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzae043.

[8] R. Tian, Y. Zheng, R. Liu et al., “Efficacy and safety of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery versus conventional breast-conserving surgery: An updated meta-analysis,” The Breast, vol. 77, Art. no. 103784, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103784.

[9] S. J. Wood, Y. Gao, J. H. Lee et al., “High tumor infiltrating lymphocytes are significantly associated with pathological complete response in triple negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant KEYNOTE-522 chemoimmunotherapy,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 205, pp. 193–199, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07233-2.

[10] J. Y. S. Tsang and G. M. Tse, “Molecular classification of breast cancer,” Advances in Anatomic Pathology, 2023, PMID: 37268505.

[11] R. Waykar and S. Kumarapillai, “Breast cancer histopathology, classification and clinical management: Current perspectives,” Bioinformation, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 2069–2079, 2024, doi: 10.6026/9732063002002069.

[12] “Recent advances and updated highlights in breast cancer pathologic diagnosis: A narrative review,” 2024, PMID: 39980805.

[13] “Current status of gene therapy for breast cancer: Progress and challenges,” International Journal of Nanomedicine, 2014, PMID: 25419154.

[14] “Viral gene therapy for breast cancer: Progress and challenges,” Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 2017, doi: 10.1080/14712598.2017.1338684.

[15] “Breast cancer: An overview of current therapeutic strategies, challenge, and perspectives,” 2023, PMCID: PMC10596062.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-11

How to Cite

Erkinovna, D. K., Yashin ugli, B. M., & Jasurbek qizi, K. Z. (2026). The Role of Immunotherapy and Gene Therapy in The Treatment of Breast Cancer in Middle-Aged Women: Integration with Pathomorphological Markers and Organ-Preserving Surgery. International Journal of Integrative and Modern Medicine, 4(10), 30–33. https://doi.org/10.31149/ijimm.v4i10.3015