Mobile Health for Post-Stroke Rehabilitation in Rural Uzbekistan: Can Apps Replace In-Person Physical Therapy?
Keywords:
stroke rehabilitation, mobile health, narrative review, community health workers, Technology Acceptance ModelAbstract
Background: Stroke is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide, and in rural Uzbekistan the situation is especially difficult — trained physiotherapists are almost entirely unavailable, leaving many stroke survivors with no rehabilitation support after leaving hospital. Mobile health (mHealth) apps have been proposed as a practical solution, but it is unclear how well they work in settings like rural Uzbekistan, where internet access is limited, digital literacy is low, and locally adapted tools are rare.
Methods: We conducted a narrative literature review following PRISMA-informed search principles to identify and synthesize existing research on mHealth apps for post-stroke rehabilitation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We searched PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. Of approximately 80 articles screened, 9 studies (including 2 systematic reviews/meta-analyses) most directly addressed mHealth effectiveness, barriers, and facilitators in LMIC stroke populations and were selected for detailed synthesis. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Health Belief Model (HBM), and Diffusion of Innovations (DOI) theory were used to interpret findings.
Results: The reviewed evidence, published between 2018 and 2024 and drawn from China, Ghana, Spain, Malaysia, and multi-country meta-analyses, shows the strongest support for upper limb motor recovery. One meta-analysis found a significant improvement in Fugl-Meyer scores (MD 9.81, 95% CI 8.72 to 10.90, p<0.00001) in app users compared to controls. However, improvements in daily living independence (Barthel Index) and balance (Berg Balance Scale) were not significant in pooled analyses. Adherence was generally high when human support was present alongside the app. The most consistently reported barriers were low digital literacy, poor internet connectivity, device affordability, and lack of apps in local languages. The most consistently reported facilitators were family involvement, clinician or nurse check-ins, simple app design, and community health worker support.
Conclusion: mHealth apps show genuine promise for improving upper limb function after stroke in LMICs, but their impact on daily living and balance is less certain. In a country like Uzbekistan where many rural patients receive no rehabilitation at all, even these partial benefits are meaningful. Success depends on human support, local language adaptation, and offline functionality. Primary research conducted directly in Uzbekistan, alongside investment in locally designed apps and community health worker training, is urgently needed.
References
[1] Feigin VL, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2021. Lancet Neurol. 2024. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39304265/
[2] Langhorne P, Baylan S. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34986727/
[3] Kairy D, et al. A systematic review of clinical outcomes associated with telerehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2009. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0225150
[4] Laver KE, et al. Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10681061/
[5] Opoku EN, et al. Effectiveness of telerehabilitation for adults with neurological conditions in LMICs. PLOS Digit Health. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000911
[6] Al-Arkee S, et al. Mobile apps to improve medication adherence in cardiovascular disease. J Med Internet Res. 2021. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39541653/
[7] World Health Organization. Uzbekistan country data profile. Geneva: WHO; 2024. https://data.who.int/countries/860
[8] Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). Rehabilitation workforce development in Uzbekistan. Tokyo: JICA; 2023. https://www.jica.go.jp/english/information/blog/1574323_24156.html
[9] World Physiotherapy. Exploring opportunities to advance physiotherapy education in Uzbekistan. London: World Physiotherapy; 2023. https://world.physio/news/exploring-opportunities-advance-physiotherapy-education-uzbekistan
[10] DataReportal. Digital 2024: Uzbekistan. Singapore: DataReportal; 2024. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-uzbekistan
[11] GSMA. Uzbekistan's digital policy advancements. London: GSMA; 2024. https://www.gsma.com/solutions-and-impact/connectivity-for-good/public-policy/uzbekistans-digital-policy-advancements-set-the-scene-for-m360-eurasia/
[12] Freedom House. Freedom on the Net 2024: Uzbekistan. Washington, DC: Freedom House; 2024. https://freedomhouse.org/country/uzbekistan/freedom-net/2024
[13] Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13(3):319–340. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/200085965
[14] Rosenstock IM. Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Educ Monogr. 1974;2(4):328–335. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/109019817400200405
[15] Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003. https://archive.org/details/diffusionofinnov00roge
[16] Adu MD, et al. Factors influencing the use of mHealth apps among patients with long-term conditions. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2018. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30201060/
[17] Page MJ, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
[28] Guo L, et al. Clinical study of a wearable remote rehabilitation training system for patients with stroke: RCT. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023;11:e40416. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36821348/
[29] Cao W, et al. Effectiveness of mobile application interventions for stroke survivors: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024;24(1):6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38167316/
[30] Grau-Pellicer M, et al. Impact of mHealth technology on adherence to healthy physical activity after stroke: a randomized study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2020;27(5):354–368. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31790639/
[31] Tchero H, et al. Telerehabilitation for stroke survivors: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(10):e10867. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30368437/
[32] Nichols M, et al. Post-intervention qualitative assessment of mobile health technology among Ghanaian stroke survivors. J Neurol Sci. 2019;406:116462. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31563705/
[33] Leochico CFD, et al. Challenges to the emergence of telerehabilitation in a developing country: a systematic review. Front Neurol. 2020;11:1007. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33013666/
[34] Sidek NN, et al. A mixed-methods study on the implementation of a mobile health app for stroke caregivers in Malaysia. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1222260. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37905189/
[35] Sarfo FS, et al. Phone-based intervention for blood pressure control among Ghanaian stroke survivors: pilot RCT. Int J Stroke. 2019;14(6):630–638. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30526786/
[36] Yan LL, et al. Effectiveness of a primary care-based integrated mobile health intervention for stroke management in rural China (SINEMA): cluster RCT. PLoS Med. 2021;18(4):e1003582. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33886543/