Biomechanical Evaluation of Occlusal Load Distribution in Fixed Partial Dentures

Authors

  • Olimov Ramazon Olim ugli Samarkand State Medical University, Department of Orthopedic Dentistry, 1st year clinical supervisor
  • Akhmedov Alisher Astanovich Professor of Orthopedic Dentistry Department of Samarkand State Medical University

Keywords:

Fixed partial dentures, Occlusal load distribution, Biomechanical evaluation

Abstract

Fixed partial dentures (FPDs) are a primary prosthodontic solution for the rehabilitation of partially edentulous patients, providing functional and aesthetic restoration. The biomechanical behavior of FPDs under occlusal load is critical to long-term success, influencing framework stress, abutment stability, marginal adaptation, and surrounding bone integrity. This study investigates the occlusal load distribution in various fixed partial denture designs using clinical assessment and finite element analysis. Thirty patients received metal-ceramic and all-ceramic FPDs spanning two to three missing teeth. Clinical parameters, including occlusal contacts, abutment mobility, and framework integrity, were evaluated alongside three-dimensional finite element models simulating occlusal forces of 100–250 N. Results demonstrated that cantilevered extensions and long-span FPDs experienced higher stress at abutment connectors, whereas short-span FPDs with rigid frameworks showed uniform load distribution. All-ceramic FPDs exhibited greater stress at connector regions but maintained clinical stability. Findings highlight the importance of biomechanical considerations in FPD design, emphasizing framework material selection, connector dimension, and occlusal scheme optimization for predictable clinical outcomes.

References

1. Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR. “Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials.” 13th edition. Elsevier, 2018.

2. Pjetursson BE, et al. “A systematic review of survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures.” Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:631–642.

3. Rees JS. “Biomechanics of fixed partial dentures: connector dimensions and stress distribution.” J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78:131–138.

4. Abduo J, Lyons K. “Clinical considerations for zirconia-based fixed partial dentures.” J Prosthodont. 2012;21:263–270.

5. Fages M, et al. “Finite element analysis in prosthodontics: evaluation of stress in FPDs.” Dent Mater. 2005;21:91–99.

6. Goodacre CJ, et al. “Occlusal considerations in fixed partial dentures.” J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90:72–83.

7. Sailer I, et al. “Long-term clinical outcomes of all-ceramic FPDs.” Int J Prosthodont. 2018;31:45–52.

8. Zarone F, et al. “Mechanical behavior of cantilevered FPDs: a review.” J Dent. 2011;39:569–580.

9. Bindl A, Mörmann WH. “Strength and fracture resistance of all-ceramic FPDs.” Quintessence Int. 2005;36:567–579.

10. Esposito M, et al. “Biological and technical outcomes of fixed partial dentures: systematic review.” Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:236–251.

11. Guess PC, et al. “Connector design in all-ceramic FPDs: a clinical and laboratory evaluation.” J Prosthodont. 2008;17:435–442.

12. Kois JC. “Occlusal considerations in posterior FPDs: guidelines for clinical practice.” Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2004;25:823–832.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-06

How to Cite

Olimov Ramazon Olim ugli, & Akhmedov Alisher Astanovich. (2026). Biomechanical Evaluation of Occlusal Load Distribution in Fixed Partial Dentures. International Journal of Alternative and Contemporary Therapy, 4(2), 10–12. Retrieved from https://medicaljournals.eu/index.php/IJACT/article/view/2633

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.