Clinical Effectiveness of Individualized Occlusiographic Analysis in Restoring Occlusal Contacts in Patients with Pathological Tooth Wear

Authors

  • M.T. Safarov Scientific Supervisor, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Hospital Orthopedic Dentistry, Tashkent State Medical University, Uzbekistan
  • D.N. Khabilov Associate Professor, Department of Hospital Orthopedic Dentistry, Tashkent State Medical University, Uzbekistan
  • N.O. Olimjonova First-Year Master’s Studentы in Hospital Orthopedic Dentistry, Tashkent State Medical University, Uzbekistan
  • M.U. Odilova First-Year Master’s Studentы in Hospital Orthopedic Dentistry, Tashkent State Medical University, Uzbekistan
  • K.A. Kosimova First-Year Master’s Studentы in Hospital Orthopedic Dentistry, Tashkent State Medical University, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31149/ijimm.v4i2.2652

Keywords:

Pathological Tooth Wear, Occlusal Contacts, Individualized Occlusiography, Molar Restoration, Prosthodontic Rehabilitation

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of individualized occlusiographic analysis in restoring occlusal contacts in patients with pathological tooth wear affecting molar teeth. A prospective clinical study was conducted involving patients diagnosed with pathological tooth wear who required restorative treatment of posterior teeth. Individualized occlusiographic analysis was performed at multiple stages of treatment to assess occlusal contact distribution, intensity, and balance. Clinical outcomes were evaluated through comparative analysis of occlusal contact patterns before and after restoration, as well as through functional and patient-centered parameters. The results demonstrated a statistically and clinically significant improvement in the number, symmetry, and stability of occlusal contacts following restorations guided by individualized occlusiographic analysis. Post-treatment assessments revealed more uniform load distribution across molar regions, improved occlusal balance, and enhanced functional adaptation. Patients also reported subjective improvements in chewing comfort and overall satisfaction with treatment outcomes. The findings of this study confirm that individualized occlusiographic analysis is an effective adjunct in the restorative management of pathological tooth wear. Its application allows clinicians to tailor occlusal design to patient-specific functional characteristics, thereby improving clinical outcomes and reducing the risk of secondary complications. Incorporating individualized occlusiography into routine prosthodontic protocols may contribute to more predictable and functionally stable restorative results in patients with pathological tooth wear.

References

Abduo, J., & Lyons, K. (2012). Clinical considerations for increasing occlusal vertical dimension: A review. Australian Dental Journal, 57(1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01640.x

Bartlett, D., Dugmore, C., & Pathan, S. (2003). Occlusal surfaces of unrestored teeth. Journal of Dentistry, 31(8), 507–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00108-5

Dawson, P. E. (2007). Functional occlusion: From TMJ to smile design. Mosby Elsevier.

Ferrario, V. F., Sforza, C., Serrao, G., Dellavia, C., & Tartaglia, G. M. (2004). Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 31(1), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01185.x

Gibbons, A. J., & Mackie, I. C. (1997). Occlusal splint therapy in the management of bruxism. British Dental Journal, 182(6), 215–218. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809347

Johansson, A., Omar, R., & Carlsson, G. E. (2011). Bruxism and prosthetic treatment: A critical review. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 55(3), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2011.02.004

Kelleher, M., & Bishop, K. (1999). Tooth surface loss: An overview. British Dental Journal, 186(2), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800028

Lobbezoo, F., Ahlberg, J., Glaros, A. G., et al. (2013). Bruxism defined and graded: An international consensus. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 40(1), 2–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12011

Manfredini, D., Poggio, C. E., Lobbezoo, F. (2014). Is bruxism a risk factor for dental implants? Journal of Dental Research, 93(10), 843–848. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514544148

McNeill, C. (Ed.). (1997). Science and practice of occlusion. Quintessence Publishing.

Okeson, J. P. (2013). Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion (7th ed.). Mosby Elsevier.

Palla, S. (2011). Occlusion and temporomandibular disorders. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 38(6), 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02166.x

Pérez-González, F., & López-Suárez, C. (2016). Occlusal force distribution analysis using occlusiography. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 29(1), 60–66.

Pintado, M. R., Anderson, G. C., DeLong, R., & Douglas, W. H. (1997). Variation in tooth contact patterns during chewing. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 77(6), 583–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70138-5

Sarafov, M. T., & Olimjonova, N. O. (2024). Individualized occlusiographic analysis in restorative dentistry: Clinical perspectives. Journal of Prosthodontic Dentistry, 68(2), 112–119.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-16

How to Cite

Safarov, M., Khabilov, D., Olimjonova, N., Odilova, M., & Kosimova, K. (2026). Clinical Effectiveness of Individualized Occlusiographic Analysis in Restoring Occlusal Contacts in Patients with Pathological Tooth Wear. International Journal of Integrative and Modern Medicine, 4(2), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.31149/ijimm.v4i2.2652

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.