Improvement of Surgical Treatment of Chronic Hemorroy

Authors

  • Khuzhabayev S.T. Samarkand State Medical University
  • Sharipov F.A. Samarkand State Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31149/ijimm.v4i3.2787

Keywords:

Chronic Hemorrhoids, Hemorrhoidectomy, Lateral Ultrasound Dissection

Abstract

The dissertation research is based on a comparative analysis of the results of providing specialized surgical care to 161 hemorrhoids patients. Hemorrhoidectomy with lateral ultrasound dissection in a cutting pattern is accompanied by significantly less pronounced disorders in the contractile activity of the rectal obturator apparatus compared to the electrochemical dissection of hemorrhoidal nodes. Changes in the average indicators of intraanal resting pressure and voluntary contraction of the sphincter after its execution did not reach statistical significance. At the same time, after Milligan-Morgan's operation using electrocoagulation, a decrease in the mean intraanal pressure of the voluntary contraction of the sphincter was noted by more than 33% of the initial value (p<0.05). Hemorrhoidectomy with lateral ultrasound dissection in a cutting pattern is characterized by a low frequency of complications compared to Milligan-Morgan surgery performed using electrocoagulation (4.5% and 19.4%, p<0.05), less pronounced pain syndrome, which significantly improves the course of the early postoperative period and ensures a reduction in the rehabilitation period of patients.

References

[1] S. R. Brown, J. P. Tiernan, and A. J. M. Watson, “Energy devices versus conventional excisional hemorrhoidectomy: Short-term outcomes analysis,” Colorectal Disease, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1684–1692, 2020.

[2] A. A. Sazonov, N. A. Maistrenko, P. N. Romashchenko, and I. A. Makarov, “Comprehensive assessment of hemorrhoidectomy with lateral ultrasound dissection in the ‘cut’ mode,” Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 17–22, 2021.

[3] J. Wang, B. Zhao, and Y. Li, “Ultrasonic scalpel versus LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy: Randomized clinical trial,” International Journal of Surgery, vol. 92, p. 106042, 2021.

[4] N. A. Maistrenko et al., “Hemorrhoidectomy using modern high-energy devices: The effectiveness of ultrasonic techniques,” Vestnik khirurgii im. I. I. Grekova, vol. 181, no. 4, pp. 45–52, 2022.

[5] V. P. Sazhin and A. A. Korneev, “Early postoperative pain and wound healing after ultrasonic hemorrhoidectomy,” Techniques in Coloproctology, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 623–630, 2022.

[6] H. Zhang, X. Chen, and P. Liu, “Comparison of postoperative complications after ultrasound and monopolar hemorrhoidectomy,” BMC Surgery, vol. 23, p. 118, 2023.

[7] “Hemorrhoidectomy with lateral ultrasound dissection in cutting mode in patients with stages 3–4 hemorrhoids,” Koloproktologia, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 85–92, 2024.

[8] A. G. Ardanakin, “Justification of the effectiveness of hemorrhoidectomy with lateral ultrasound dissection in a cutting mode,” Cand. Med. Sci. dissertation abstract, S. M. Kirov Military Medical Academy, Saint Petersburg, Russia, 2025.

[9] C. Milito, G. Gargiani, and G. Cortese, “Randomized trial comparing LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy with conventional excisional hemorrhoidectomy,” Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1252–1257, 2002.

[10] A. Mastakov, A. Buettner, and S. Hoelzer, “LigaSure versus Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: A prospective randomized study,” Techniques in Coloproctology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 145–149, 2008.

[11] A. T. Jayne, S. R. Brown, and N. J. Radcliffe, “Randomized clinical trial of LigaSure versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 428–432, 2002.

[12] C. Nienhuijs and O. de Hingh, “Pain after conventional versus LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy: A meta-analysis,” International Journal of Colorectal Disease, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 341–349, 2010.

[13] A. Gravie, M. Lehur, J. Huten, et al., “Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: A prospective randomized trial,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 242, no. 1, pp. 29–35, 2005.

[14] A. S. Shanmugam, M. Thaha, J. C. Rabindranath, et al., “Systematic review of randomized trials comparing rubber band ligation with excisional hemorrhoidectomy,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 92, no. 12, pp. 1481–1487, 2005.

[15] A. L. Sun and H. L. Yang, “Clinical outcomes of ultrasonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy compared with conventional methods,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 20, no. 44, pp. 16817–16823, 2014.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-17

How to Cite

Khuzhabayev S.T., & Sharipov F.A. (2026). Improvement of Surgical Treatment of Chronic Hemorroy. International Journal of Integrative and Modern Medicine, 4(3), 163–168. https://doi.org/10.31149/ijimm.v4i3.2787

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.