Assessment of Organs-at-Risk Dose Constraints in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy

Mohammed S. Altaee; Moamin Junaid Salim

Authors

Mohammed S. Altaee Assistant Lecturer, Department of physiology, College of Medicine, Nineveh University, Mosul, Iraq
Moamin Junaid Salim Assist Professor, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Nineveh University, Mosul, Iraq

Vol. 3 No. 11 (2025): International Journal of Alternative and Contemporary Therapy

Articles

November 11, 2025

Downloads

View Article

Abstract
How to Cite
Metrics
References

Background: As one of the most widespread malignant tumours found among men worldwide, prostate cancer (PCa) has carried on demanding an ongoing search for improved therapeutic strategies. Radiotherapy (RT) plays a vital role in the overall treatment of PCa, particularly in the surgical curative stages. However, following surgery anatomical changes raise the susceptibility of anatomically adjacent organs at risk (OARs) such as bladder and rectum to radiation-induced toxicity.

Aim: This study aimed to analyze the recommended dose constraints for optimal coverage of OARs in prostate cancer radiotherapy by assessing modern RT techniques, including three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

Material and methods: The present study was based on clinical data from 60 prostate cancer patients treated using consistent treatment planning protocols across several hospitals in Iraq. Dose calculations resulting from both the treatment planning system (TPS) and Monte Carlo simulations were compared to check the actual dose distributions. A comparative study of organ dosimetry established optimal dose constraints and treatment precisions.

Results: Under optimized conditions, significant variations still occur in organ dosimetry which requires precise dose constraints to achieve minimal toxicity; postoperative curing difficulties result in far too low therapeutic ratios for hypo fractionated therapies; the integration of image-guided radiotherapy systems (IGRS) and adaptive planning strategies helped to improve treatment accuracy.

Conclusions: This study underscores the need to develop individualized dose constraint protocols for OARs to improve treatment response and reduce complications in prostate cancer radiotherapy. The results call for the adjustment of postoperative dose control standards and consideration of the possible incorporation of sophisticated modalities such as proton therapy. Future research should focus on multicentric validation to develop clinical standards as well as elsewhere being carried.

Altaee , M. S., & Salim , M. J. (2025). Assessment of Organs-at-Risk Dose Constraints in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy. International Journal of Alternative and Contemporary Therapy, 3(11), 4–11. Retrieved from https://medicaljournals.eu/index.php/IJACT/article/view/2302

Download Citation

1. Bogaert, L. et al. (2025). A pre-, peri- and postoperative rehabilitation pathway for lumbar fusion surgery (react): A nonrandomized controlled clinical trial. European Spine Journal, 34(4), 1513-1527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08706-2

2. Li, M. et al. (2025). Effects of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (imrt) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (vmat) on survival benefits and poor prognostic factors in patients with cervical cancer. BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-025-01433-1

3. Qiu, X. et al. (2025). Uncovering novel susceptible genes and therapeutic targets of prostate cancer: A multi-omics study integrating summary-based mendelian randomization analysis and molecular docking. Biological Procedures Online, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12575-025-00298-x

4. Yadav, P., Sohn, J., and Khan, A. U. (2024). The first low-field mri-guided radiation therapy hybrid integrated system: Mridian. A Practical Guide to MR-Linac, 149-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48165-9_9

5. Puttanawarut, C. et al. (2021). Biological dosiomic features for the prediction of radiation pneumonitis in esophageal cancer patients. Radiation Oncology, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01950-y

6. Valle, L. et al. (2024). Mri-guided radiation therapy for prostate cancer: Less is more when technology and evidence intersect. A Practical Guide to MR-Linac, 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48165-9_16

7. Da Silva Mendes, V. et al. (2021). Dosimetric comparison of mr-linac-based imrt and conventional vmat treatment plans for prostate cancer. Radiation Oncology, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01858-7

8. Trofymov, A. et al. (2025). Intensity modulated radiation therapy in prostate cancer—better survival with higher total dose?. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 201(8), 837-845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-025-02392-1

9. Aizawa, R., and Mizowaki, T. (2025). Narrative review of focal boost to intraprostatic dominant lesion in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for localized or locally advanced prostate cancer. International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 30(8), 1448-1462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02799-x

10. Momin, S. et al. (2021). Knowledge‐based radiation treatment planning: A data‐driven method survey. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 22(8), 16-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13337

11. Cheng, L. J. et al. (2025). Patient-reported outcomes and their associated factors at 1- and 2-year follow-up after lumbar spine surgery: A surgery registry study. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-04049-z

12. Huh, H. D., and Kim, S. (2020). History of radiation therapy technology. Progress in Medical Physics, 31(3), 124-134. https://doi.org/10.14316/pmp.2020.31.3.124

13. Baran, M. et al. (2022). Isodoses—a set theory-based patient-specific qa measure to compare planned and delivered isodose distributions in photon radiotherapy. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 198(9), 849-861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-022-01964-9

14. Aymane, K. et al. (2025). Are treatment plans optimized on the basis of acuros xb dose calculation robust against anatomic changes during online adaptive radiotherapy for lung cancer regarding dose homogeneity?. Radiation Oncology, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-025-02656-1

15. Schörghofer, A. et al. (2019). Rectum-spacer related acute toxicity – endoscopy results of 403 prostate cancer patients after implantation of gel or balloon spacers. Radiation Oncology, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1248-6

16. Minetama, M. et al. (2025). Answer to the letter to the editor of d. liao, et al. concerning "do postoperative changes in physical function affect patient-reported outcomes in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing rehabilitation? a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial" by m. minetama, et al. (eur spine j [2025]; doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09302-0).. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-04784-x.pdf

17. Hoeng, L. et al. (2024). Very pronounced bowel sparing during radiation therapy for anal carcinoma using a natural spacer (myoma) – a case report. Radiation Oncology, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02530-6

18. Roeder, F. et al. (2020). Recent advances in (chemo-)radiation therapy for rectal cancer: A comprehensive review. Radiation Oncology, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01695-0

19. Freitas, R. et al. (2025). Cost-effectiveness of a high-concentration (179 mg) capsaicin patch for the treatment of patients with peripheral neuropathic pain in scotland. Pain and Therapy, 14(5), 1573-1595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-025-00769-9

20. Fan, D. et al. (2022). Effectiveness of the attachment position in molar intrusion with clear aligners: A finite element study. BMC Oral Health, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02472-z

21. Perrucci, E. et al. (2024). Prevention and management of radiotherapy-related toxicities in gynecological malignancies. position paper on behalf of airo (italian association of radiotherapy and clinical oncology). La radiologia medica, 129(9), 1329-1351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-024-01844-5

22. Wang, K., and Tepper, J. E. (2021). Radiation therapy‐associated toxicity: Etiology, management, and prevention. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71(5), 437-454. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21689

23. Morén, B., Larsson, T., and Tedgren, Å. C. (2021). Optimization in treatment planning of high dose‐rate brachytherapy — review and analysis of mathematical models. Medical Physics, 48(5), 2057-2082. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14762

24. Farr, J. et al. (2022). Ultra‐high dose rate radiation production and delivery systems intended for flash. Medical Physics, 49(7), 4875-4911. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.15659

25. Ahire, V. et al. (2023). Radiobiology of combining radiotherapy with other cancer treatment modalities. Radiobiology Textbook, 311-386. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18810-7_6

26. Cravéreau, O. et al. (2025). Novel use of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for refractory ventricular tachycardia with cardiac metastasis of primary renal cell carcinoma: A case report. Cardio-Oncology, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40959-025-00392-9

27. Kutuk, T. et al. (2024). Mr-linac-guided adaptive radiotherapy for brain tumors. A Practical Guide to MR-Linac, 375-394. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48165-9_20

28. Borowicz, D. M. et al. (2022). Does cyberknife improve dose distribution versus imrt and vmat on a linear accelerator in low-risk prostate cancer?. Radiology and Oncology, 56(2), 259-266. https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2022-0010

29. Gani, C. et al. (2025). Adaptive und automatisierte strahlentherapie. Die Onkologie, 31(5), 477-482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-025-01682-8

International Journal of Alternative and Contemporary Therapy

Assessment of Organs-at-Risk Dose Constraints in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy

Authors

Downloads

Similar Articles

Menu

Our Journal

SocialShare

counter

Information