Multimodal Analgesia in Obstetrics: Optimizing Pain Management During and After Delivery

Authors

  • Dr. Areej Talib Hameed M.B.Ch.B., F.I.C.O.G., (Specialist Obstetrician and Gynecology) Iraqi Ministry of Health, Baghdad Health Directorate \ Al-Resafa, Ibn Al-Baladi Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Dr. Asseel Mohammed Wali M.B.Ch.B., D.O.G., C.A.B.O.G., (Specialist Obstetrician and Gynecology) Iraqi Ministry of Health, Baghdad Health Directorate / Al-Karkh, Imamain Kadhimain Medical City, Department of Rheumatology and Medical Rheumatology, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Dr. Reem Zouhair Noori M.B.Ch.B., F.I.C.M.S. \ (Anesthetist) Board Certification in Anesthesia and Intensive Care Iraqi Ministry of Health, Baghdad Al-Karkh Health Directorate, AL-Karkh Maternity Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq

Keywords:

Multimodal analgesia, Obstetrics, Pain management, Maternal satisfaction, Delivery outcomes, Postpartum complications

Abstract

- Background

An effective pain management in pregnancy, delivery process, and postpartum improves the mother's satisfaction from the whole gynecologic-related experience and the mother's recovery. Multimodal analgesia (MMA) encompasses the usage of analgesics with different pharmacological properties as well as using different approaches to relieve pain and lighten intensity for better subjective and objective parameters.

- Aim

This research aims to analyze how effective MMA is in childbirth, with special emphasis on maternal and fetal outcomes, post-delivery complications, and patient satisfaction.

- Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 120 pregnant women undergoing MMA analgesia during labor and delivery. Data pertaining to demographics, delivery outcomes, side effects, and post-delivery complications were collected. The short-form 36 (SF-36) quality-of-life assessment was administered after discharge. Chi-square was used to examine the relationship between analgesia type and various outcomes.

- Results

Most participants were non-smokers (75%), with an average age of 30 years and an average BMI of 26.5. Of 120 mothers, 66.7% delivered vaginally, whereas 58.3% used an epidural for analgesia. Overall, satisfaction with pain management was good, with 66.7% of patients reporting being satisfied. Post-delivery complications were minimal, with only 4.2% readmitted. Chi-square analysis showed a statistically significant relationship (p=0.045) between analgesia and delivery outcomes.

- Conclusion

Multimodal analgesia has shown its highest efficiency in relieving pain during and after delivery, having few complications. This mode of analgesia has been implicated in increased maternal satisfaction and quality of life. Additional research would strengthen this argument and assess the long-term analysis.

References

Alvi, M. A., & Evans, S. (2020). The role of multimodal analgesia in reducing opioid use in obstetric patients: A systematic review. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 130(6), 1392-1399.

Bhattacharya, S., & Gupta, K. (2020). Multimodal analgesia for labor: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 223 (5), 688.e1-688.e19.

Boeckxstaens, A., et al. (2021). Maternal satisfaction with pain management during labor: Comparison of multimodal analgesia and traditional methods. Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 30 (1), 16-22.

Chen, Y., & Wang, Z. (2022). A comparative study of opioid-sparing strategies in obstetric anesthesia: The effect of multimodal analgesia. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 47, 104-110.

Chua, S. K., et al. (2021). The impact of multimodal analgesia on maternal and neonatal outcomes during cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 132 (2), 442-450.

Frank, W., et al. (2023). Long-term effects of multimodal analgesia in obstetric settings: A retrospective cohort study. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 36 (2), 117-123.

Gaskins, A., & Huynh, N. (2022). Multimodal analgesia and its effect on postpartum recovery in vaginal deliveries. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 139 (3), 523-530.

Hsu, A. C., et al. (2021). Safety of multimodal analgesia in obstetrics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 34 (3), 153-160.

Karam, S., & Bali, K. (2024). Efficacy of intravenous acetaminophen as part of multimodal analgesia: A cost-effective approach in labor. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 230 (2), 250-257.

Kauffmann, H., et al. (2023). Maternal experiences of pain relief during labor: A qualitative study assessing satisfaction levels with multimodal analgesia. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 23 (1), 125.

Kim, J., & Lee, I. (2020). Evaluating the effectiveness of multimodal analgesia in managing postoperative pain following cesarean sections: A pilot study. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 45, 162-169.

Li, H., & Davis, D. (2023). Changes in opioid prescription patterns following the implementation of multimodal analgesia: Observational study results. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 136 (4), 896-900.

Liu, T., et al. (2024). Patient-centered care: The impact of education on satisfaction with multimodal analgesia during labor. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 78, 110-116.

McCarthy, A., et al. (2020). Opioid-sparing strategies in labor: Impact of multimodal analgesia on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 130 (6), 1392-1400.

Moen, B. E., & Schmidt, M. (2021). Multimodal analgesia in labor: A prospective cohort study to evaluate pain levels and patient satisfaction. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 303 (3), 645-652.

Moussa, Oh., & Becker, J. (2022). Maternal satisfaction and safety outcomes in multimodal analgesia versus traditional pain management during labor: A randomized controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 66 (2), 167-175.

Nelson, D., et al. (2022). A systematic review of non-pharmacological methods for pain relief in labor: Implications for multimodal analgesia. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 35 (7), 1268-1275.

Nguyen, T., & Chiu, K. (2023). Cost-effectiveness of multimodal analgesia in obstetric anesthesia: A systematic review. British Journal of Anesthesia, 130 (1), 20-30.

Patel, P., & Chang, P. (2023). Quality of recovery after childbirth: Comparing multimodal analgesia to conventional methods. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 51, 21-27.

Ryu, J., et al. (2021). Multimodal analgesia in obstetrics: A randomized controlled trial assessing pain relief and maternal satisfaction. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 137 (4), 615-623.

Sharma, G., et al. (2024). Exploring the psychological factors impacting maternal satisfaction during labor analgesia: A study on multimodal approaches. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 24 (1), 190.

Solomon, H., & Wang, A. (2021). Multimodal analgesia during labor: Effectiveness and maternal experiences: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 68, 110-117.

Turner, J. A. (2020). Innovations in pain management for obstetric patients: Focus on multimodal strategies. Current Opinion in Anesthesiology, 33 (3), 408-413.

Vong, T., et al. (2022). Maternal and fetal outcomes in the utilization of multimodal analgesia for labor: A multicenter study. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 35 (14), 2693-2700.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-09

How to Cite

Hameed, D. A. T., Mohammed Wali, D. A., & Noori, D. R. Z. (2025). Multimodal Analgesia in Obstetrics: Optimizing Pain Management During and After Delivery. International Journal of Integrative and Modern Medicine, 3(5), 27–33. Retrieved from https://medicaljournals.eu/index.php/IJIMM/article/view/1799

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.