Radiographic Assessment of Soft Tissue Thickness at the Anterior Area of Maxilla and Mandible in A Patient With Different Dental Malocclusions

Authors

  • Ryaheen Ghazi Rashid B.D.S., M.Sc. (oral and maxillofacial radiology), College of Dentistry, University of Bilad Alrafidain, Diyala, 32001, Iraq, School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia

Keywords:

CBCT, lateral cephalometric, gender, malocclusion

Abstract

Background: Concerns about the accuracy and reliability of soft tissue thickness using CBCT and lateral cephalometric techniques.

Objective: The aim of the study is to estimate the accuracy and reliability of soft tissue thickness with CBCT and lateral cephalometric imaging for gender determination and to indicate the difference in soft tissue thickness in different dental malocclusions.

Material and methods: This study was conducted using 57 radiographic images (35 CBCT and 22 lateral cephalometric). Measurements for the thickness of soft tissue were done on the area of the anterior maxilla and mandible for both techniques.

Results: males have significantly thicker soft tissue than females in the area of the chin and distance from the labial surface of upper and lower central incisors to the surface of the lip, with p-values (0.0325,0.010,0.0094) respectively. An individual with Cl III shows a significant increase in soft tissue thickness in the area of distance from the labial surface of the upper central incisor to the surface of the upper lip, with a p-value 0.0018.

Conclusion: Males were characterized by thicker facial soft tissue compared with female patients in Class I. Individuals with Cl III show a reduction in the thickness of soft tissue in the area of the chin and an increase in the thickness in the area of the upper lip.

References

1.Saghiri, M.A., Eid, J., Tang, C.K. and Freag, P., 2021. Factors influencing different types of malocclusion and arch form–A review. Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 122(2), pp.185-191.

2.Nisanci Yilmaz, M.N., Koseoglu Secgin, C., Ozemre, M.O., İnonu, E., Aslan, S. and Bulut, S., 2022. Assessment of gingival thickness in the maxillary anterior region using different techniques. Clinical Oral Investigations, 26(11), pp.6531-6538.

3. Kharbanda, O.P., Wadhawan, N. and Sennimalai, K., 2023. Orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning: Collaborating with medical and other dental specialists. Integrated Clinical Orthodontics, pp.18-51

4. Rajbhoj, A.A., Stroo, M., Begnoni, G., Willems, G. and De Llano-Perula, M.C., 2023. Skeletal and soft-tissue changes in humans with untreated normal occlusion throughout lifetime: a systematic review. Odontology, 111(2), pp.263-309.

5. Alhumadi, A., Al-Khafaji, T.J., Alyassiri, A.M.H. and Alhamadi, W.W., 2022. Gender differences in lower facial soft tissue thickness among different skeletal patterns, based on soft tissue cephalometric analysis. Journal of Orthodontic Science, 11(1), p.54.

6. Togninalli, D., Antonarakis, G.S. and Papadopoulou, A.K., 2024. Relationship between craniofacial skeletal patterns and anatomic characteristics of masticatory muscles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Progress in Orthodontics, 25(1), p.36.

7. Guo, J.X., Xu, X., Fan, L. and Pan, Y.C., 2024. Facial soft tissue characteristics of patients with different types of malocclusion. BMC Oral Health, 24(1), p.1173.

8. Moon, S., Mohamed, A.M.A., He, Y., Dong, W., Yaosen, C. and Yang, Y., 2021. Extraction vs. Nonextraction on Soft‐Tissue Profile Change in Patients with Malocclusion: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. BioMed research international, 2021(1), p.7751516.

9. Kiełczykowski, M., Perkowski, K., Kamiński, K., Zadurska, M. and Czochrowska, E., 2024. Evaluation of the soft tissue facial profile in different skeletal malocclusions in relation to age. BMC Oral Health, 24(1), p.711.

10. Maddalone, M., Losi, F., Rota, E. and Baldoni, M.G., 2019. Relationship between the Position of the Incisors and the Thickness of the Soft Tissues in the Upper Jaw: Cephalometric Evaluation. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 12(5), p.391.

11. Bulut, O., Gungor, K., Thiemann, N., Hizliol, I., Gurcan, S., Hekimoglu, B., Kaya, E., Ozdede, M. and Akay, G., 2017. Repeatability of facial soft tissue thickness measurements for forensic facial reconstruction using X-ray images. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 49(2), pp.134-141.

12. Cha, K.S., 2013. Soft-tissue thickness of South Korean adults with normal facial profiles. Korean Journal of Orthodontics, 43(4), p.178.

13. Machado, G.L., 2015. CBCT imaging–A boon to orthodontics. The Saudi dental journal, 27(1), pp.12-21.

14. Alhumadi, A., Al-Khafaji, T.J., Alyassiri, A.M.H. and Alhamadi, W.W., 2022. Gender differences in lower facial soft tissue thickness among different skeletal patterns, based on soft tissue cephalometric analysis. Journal of Orthodontic Science, 11(1), p.54

15. Piombino, P., Esposito, E., Committeri, U., Barone, S., Arena, A., Cataldo, R., Carraturo, E., Vaira, L.A., De Riu, G., Mariniello, D. and Califano, L., 2023. Facial soft tissue thickness measurement method and relationship with BMI, age and sex. Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 124(4), p.101420

16. Joshi, M., Wu, L.P., Maharjan, S. and Regmi, M.R., 2015. Sagittal lip positions in different skeletal malocclusions: a cephalometric analysis. Progress in orthodontics, 16(1), p.8.

17. Anic-Milosevic, S., Mestrovic, S., Prlić, A. and Slaj, M., 2010. Proportions in the upper lip–lower lip–chin area of the lower face as determined by photogrammetric method. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 38(2), pp.90-95.

18. Anicÿ-Miloševicÿ, S., Lapter-Varga, M. and Šlaj, M., 2008. Analysis of the soft tissue facial profile by means of angular measurements. The European Journal of Orthodontics, 30(2), pp.135-140.

19. Rose, A.D., Woods, M.G., Clement, J.G. and Thomas, C.D.L., 2003. Lateral facial soft‐tissue prediction model: analysis using Fourier shape descriptors and traditional cephalometric methods. American Journal of Physical Anthropology: The Official Publication of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, 121(2), pp.172-180.

20. Dimaggio, F.R., Ciusa, V., Sforza, C. and Ferrario, V.F., 2007. Photographic soft-tissue profile analysis in children at 6 years of age. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 132(4), pp.475-480.

21. Perović, T. and Blažej, Z., 2018. Male and female characteristics of facial soft tissue thickness in different orthodontic malocclusions evaluated by cephalometric radiography. Medical science monitor: international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 24, p.3415.

22. Kaur, K., Sehrawat, J.S. and Bahadur, R., 2017. Sex dependent variations in craniofacial soft-tissue thicknesses estimated from MRI and CT scans: A pilot study based on Northwest Indian subjects. Int J Diagn Imaging, 4, pp.47-56.

23. Aggarwal, I. and Singla, A., 2016. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis applied to Himachali ethnic population. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences, 8(3), pp.124-130.

24. Al-Mashhadany, S.M., Al-Chalabi, H.M. and Nahidh, M., 2017. Evaluation of facial soft tissue thickness in normal adults with different vertical discrepancies. Int J Sci Res, 6(2), pp.938-42.

25. Tanić, T., Blažej, Z. and Mitić, V., 2011. Soft tissue thickness of face profile conditioning by dento-skeletal anomalies. Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo, 139(7-8), pp.439-445.

26. Kamak, H. and Celikoglu, M., 2012. Facial soft tissue thickness among skeletal malocclusions: is there a difference?. Korean journal of orthodontics, 42(1), p.23.

27. Jabbar, A., Zia, A.U., Shaikh, I.A., Channar, K.A., Memon, A.B. and Jatoi, N., 2016. Evaluation of soft tissue chin thickness in various skeletal malocclusions. Pakistan Orthodontic Journal, 8(1), pp.62-66.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-26

How to Cite

Rashid, R. G. (2026). Radiographic Assessment of Soft Tissue Thickness at the Anterior Area of Maxilla and Mandible in A Patient With Different Dental Malocclusions. International Journal of Alternative and Contemporary Therapy, 4(2), 95–102. Retrieved from https://medicaljournals.eu/index.php/IJACT/article/view/2660

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.