Biomechanical Rationale and Surgical Strategies for Mandibular Condylar Process Fractures: A Review of Computational and Clinical Evidence
Keywords:
Mandibular condyle, fracture fixation, biomechanics, finite element analysis, reviewAbstract
Mandibular condylar process fractures represent one of the most complex and controversial areas in maxillofacial trauma surgery, accounting for approximately 25-35% of all mandibular fractures. The anatomical complexity of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) region, combined with the critical functional requirements for mastication, speech, and jaw mobility, makes the management of condylar fractures particularly challenging for surgeons. The condylar process serves as a crucial biomechanical pivot point, transmitting masticatory forces while enabling complex three-dimensional mandibular movements, which necessitates a thorough understanding of both mechanical principles and surgical techniques for optimal treatment outcomes.
References
[1] H. H. Zhou, Q. Liu, G. Cheng, and Z. B. Li, “Aetiology, pattern and treatment of mandibular condylar fractures in 549 patients: a 22-year retrospective study,” J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 34–41, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.05.007.
[2] E. Ellis III, K. F. Moos, and A. el-Attar, “Ten years of mandibular fractures: an analysis of 2,137 cases,” Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol., vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 120–129, 1985, doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(85)90002-7.
[3] P. Boffano, F. Roccia, E. Zavattero, et al., “European Maxillofacial Trauma (EURMAT) project: a multicentre and prospective study,” J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 62–70, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.10.011.
[4] P. N. Afrooz, M. R. Bykowski, I. B. James, et al., “The epidemiology of mandibular fractures in the United States, part 1: a review of 13,142 cases from the US National Trauma Data Bank,” J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., vol. 73, no. 12, pp. 2361–2366, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.04.032.
[5] E. Ellis III and G. S. Throckmorton, “Treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures: biological considerations,” J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 115–134, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.02.019.
[6] J. H. Koolstra and T. M. van Eijden, “Biomechanical analysis of jaw-closing movements,” J. Dent. Res., vol. 74, no. 9, pp. 1564–1570, 1995, doi: 10.1177/00220345950740091001.
[7] U. Silvennoinen, T. Iizuka, K. Oikarinen, and C. Lindqvist, “Analysis of possible factors leading to problems after nonsurgical treatment of condylar fractures,” J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 793–799, 1994, doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(94)90219-4.
[8] A. N. Dwivedi, R. Tripathi, P. K. Gupta, et al., “Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of temporomandibular joint and associated soft tissue changes following acute condylar injury,” J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., vol. 70, no. 12, pp. 2829–2834, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.08.026.
[9] M. T. Brandt and R. H. Haug, “Open versus closed reduction of adult mandibular condyle fractures: a review of the literature regarding the evolution of current thoughts on management,” J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 1324–1332, 2003, doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(03)00733-4.
[10] R. V. Walker, “Condylar fractures: nonsurgical management,” J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 1185–1188, 1994, doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(94)90543-6.
[11] E. A. Al-Moraissi and E. Ellis III, “Surgical treatment of adult mandibular condylar fractures provides better outcomes than closed treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 482–493, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.09.027.
[12] T. Berner, H. Essig, P. Schumann, et al., “Closed versus open treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures: a meta-analysis of retrospective and prospective studies,” J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg., vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1404–1408, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.06.020.
[13] G. Lauer, W. Pradel, M. Schneider, and U. Eckelt, “A new 3-dimensional plate for transoral endoscopic-assisted osteosynthesis of condylar neck fractures,” J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 964–971, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.12.041.
[14] A. C. Salgarelli, A. Anesi, P. Bellini, et al., “How to improve retromandibular transmasseteric anteroparotid approach for mandibular condylar fractures: our clinical experience,” Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 464–469, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.11.013.
[15] A. Boccaccio, A. Ballini, C. Pappalettere, et al., “Finite element analysis of mandibular fractures and osteosynthesis,” J. Craniofac. Surg., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 2211–2216, 2011, doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182324b7b.
[16] S. T. Lovald, J. D. Wagner, and B. Baack, “Biomechanical optimization of bone plates used in rigid fixation of mandibular fractures,” J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 973–985, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.12.032.
[17] S. Parascandolo, A. Spinzia, et al., “Two load sharing plates fixation in mandibular condylar fractures: biomechanical basis and clinical implications,” J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg., vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 385–390, 2010.
