Anaphylactic Shock in General Internal Medicine Practice: Current Diagnostic Challenges and Emergency Management Strategies

Authors

  • Mansurov Shokhrukh Karimovich Samarkand branch of the Republican scientific center for emergency medical care
  • Jurayev Shukhrat Faridunovich Samarkand branch of the Republican scientific center for emergency medical care
  • Alimov Fozilbek Odilovich Samarkand state medical university
  • Aliyeva Fikriye Bayramovna Samarkand state medical university

Keywords:

anaphylaxis, anaphylactic shock, internal medicine, epinephrine, emergency algorithm, biphasic reaction

Abstract

Anaphylactic shock remains a rapidly progressive and potentially fatal  emergency, with increasing incidence worldwide. Despite the availability of international guidelines, mortality persists due to delayed recognition and underuse of epinephrine. Importantly, a significant proportion of first medical contacts occur in outpatient and internal medicine settings rather than emergency departments. This review aims to analyze current evidence regarding epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical heterogeneity, diagnostic pitfalls, and emergency management strategies of anaphylactic shock, with a specific focus on challenges faced by general internists. The gap between guideline recommendations and real-world clinical behavior is critically discussed.

References

1. Simons F.E.R., Ardusso L.R.F., Bilò M.B. et al. World allergy organization guidelines for the assessment and management of anaphylaxis // World Allergy Organization Journal. – 2011. – Vol. 4. – P. 13–37.

2. Cardona V., Ansotegui I.J., Ebisawa M. et al. World Allergy Organization anaphylaxis guidance 2020 // World Allergy Organization Journal. – 2020. – Vol. 13. – P. 100472.

3. Turner P.J., Jerschow E., Umasunthar T. et al. Fatal anaphylaxis: mortality rate and risk factors // Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice. – 2017. – Vol. 5. – P. 1169–1178.

4. Muraro A., Roberts G., Worm M. et al. Anaphylaxis: guidelines from the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology // Allergy. – 2014. – Vol. 69. – P. 1026–1045.

5. Pumphrey R.S.H. Fatal anaphylaxis in the United Kingdom // Clinical and Experimental Allergy. – 2000. – Vol. 30. – P. 1144–1150.

6. Campbell R.L., Luke A., Weaver A.L. et al. Epinephrine use in anaphylaxis // Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. – 2015. – Vol. 135. – P. 105–111.

7. Galli S.J., Tsai M. IgE and mast cells in allergic disease // Nature Medicine. – 2008. – Vol. 14. – P. 693–704.

8. Castells M. Anaphylaxis to drugs and biological agents // Immunology and Allergy Clinics. – 2010. – Vol. 30. – P. 535–548.

9. Kemp S.F., Lockey R.F., Simons F.E.R. Epinephrine: the drug of choice for anaphylaxis // Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. – 2008. – Vol. 121. – P. 288–292.

10. Kounis N.G. Kounis syndrome: allergic myocardial infarction // International Journal of Cardiology. – 2013. – Vol. 166. – P. 7–14.

11. Jerschow E., Lin R.Y., Scaperotti M.M. et al. Fatal anaphylaxis in the United States // Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. – 2014. – Vol. 134. – P. 1318–1328.

12. Simons K.J., Simons F.E.R. Anaphylaxis: pathogenesis and treatment // Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. – 2011. – Vol. 127. – P. 594–600.

13. Lee S., Hess E.P., Lohse C.M. et al. Biphasic reactions in emergency department patients // Annals of Emergency Medicine. – 2015. – Vol. 65. – P. 469–479.

14. Campbell R.L., Li J.T., Nicklas R.A. Emergency management of anaphylaxis // Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. – 2014. – Vol.

134. – P. 1082–1086.

15. Vadas P., Gold M., Perelman B. et al. Platelet-activating factor in severe anaphylaxis // New England Journal of Medicine. – 2013. – Vol. 358. – P. 28–35.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-22

How to Cite

Karimovich, M. S., Faridunovich, J. S., Odilovich, A. F., & Bayramovna, A. F. (2026). Anaphylactic Shock in General Internal Medicine Practice: Current Diagnostic Challenges and Emergency Management Strategies. International Journal of Alternative and Contemporary Therapy, 4(2), 73–75. Retrieved from https://medicaljournals.eu/index.php/IJACT/article/view/2681

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.