COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MODELS OF DEVELOPMENT OF INTELLECTUAL ACTIVITY IN PRIMARY EDUCATION IN UZBEKISTAN AND DEVELOPED FOREIGN COUNTRIES

Djurakulova Munira Suyunovna

Authors

Djurakulova Munira Suyunovna Independent Researcher

Keywords:

Primary Education, Intellectual Activity, Comparative Analysis, Finnish, Singaporean and South Korean Educational Models

Abstract

This article presents a comparative analysis of models for developing students' intellectual activity in the primary education systems of Uzbekistan, Finland, Singapore, and South Korea. The article examines the educational philosophy, curricula, methodological approaches, and assessment systems of each country, and analyzes the educational system of Uzbekistan, which seeks to combine traditional and modern approaches.

References

[1] B. Abdullaev, The Role of Innovative Technologies in Increasing Education Quality. Tashkent, Uzbekistan: Science Publishing House, 2019, p. 178.

[2] R. Alimov, Modern Pedagogical Technologies in the Education System of Uzbekistan. Tashkent, Uzbekistan: Ministry of Higher and Secondary Specialized Education of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2020, p. 215.

[3] N. Azizkhojaev, Pedagogical Technologies and Pedagogical Skills. Tashkent, Uzbekistan: Ministry of Higher Education of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2018, p. 240.

[4] I. Bekmuratov and R. Kamilov, "Opportunities for using interactive methods in education," Journal of the Uzbek Mathematical Society, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 87–95, 2021.

[5] E. Goziev, Psychology. Tashkent, Uzbekistan: Publishing House of the National University of Uzbekistan, 2015, p. 312.

[6] U. Karimov, Development Paths of Modern Education. Tashkent, Uzbekistan: Science and Technology, 2017, p. 198.

[7] R. Mavlonova and N. Vohidova, Primary Education Pedagogy. Tashkent, Uzbekistan: Fan Publishing House, 2019, p. 296.

[8] Ministry of Public Education of the Republic of Uzbekistan, State Educational Standard and Curricula in Mathematics. Tashkent, Uzbekistan: Printing Center of the Ministry of Public Education, 2021, p. 124.

[9] F. Rakhimov, "Advantages and problems of teaching based on the Singapore model," Journal of Pedagogical Sciences of Uzbekistan, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 33–45, 2019.

[10] M. Ruzimov, Innovative Approaches in Education. Samarkand, Uzbekistan: Samarkand State University Publishing House, 2021, p. 156.

[11] O. Taniqulova, "Mechanisms for using foreign experience to improve educational efficiency in primary education (on the example of the Singapore education system)," Journal of Preschool and School Education, vol. 3, no. 5, 2025, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15425518.

[12] K. Lonka, Phenomenal Learning from Finland. Helsinki, Finland: Edita, 2018, p. 256.

[13] P. Sahlberg, Finnish Lessons 2.0: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland?, 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Teachers College Press, 2015, p. 280.

[14] M. J. Seth, Education Fever: Society, Politics, and the Pursuit of Schooling in South Korea. Honolulu, HI, USA: University of Hawaii Press, 2018, p. 312.

[15] "Singapore education system: Singapore education and its specific features," Slaydchi, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://slaydchi.uz/product/singapur-talim