History of Minimally Invasive Coronary Surgery

Authors

  • Yarbekov R. R JSC "Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Surgery named after Academician V. Vakhidov"
  • Ilkhomov O. E. JSC "Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Surgery named after Academician V. Vakhidov"

Keywords:

cardiac surgery, minimally invasive surgery, valve surgery

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery is an attractive choice for patients undergoing major cardiac surgery. In this article, we review the history of minimally invasive heart valve surgery. With many innovations in surgical instruments, artificial circulatory systems, imaging and robotic systems, and surgical techniques, minimally invasive cardiac surgery has become the standard treatment for valve injuries. In particular, aortic cross-clamping techniques and cardioplegia techniques using a Chitwood clamp and root cannula or endoballoon catheter combined with femoral-femoral bypass systems have made such procedures safer and more practical. On the other hand, robotic surgery has not become standard due to cost and slow learning curve. However, along with the development of robotics, this less invasive method may provide patients with another choice in the near future.

References

Eveborn GW, Schirmer H, Heggelund G, Lunde P, Rasmussen K. The evolving epidemiology of valvular aortic stenosis. The Tromsø Study. Heart. 2013 Mar;99(6):396–400.

Cohn LH, Adams DH, Couper GS et al. Minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery improves patient satisfaction while reducing costs of cardiac valve replacement and repair. Ann Surg. 1997 Oct;226(4):421–6. discussion 427–8.

Goldstone AB, Joseph Woo Y. Minimally invasive surgical treatment of valvular heart disease. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Spring;26(1):36–43.

Rao PN, Kumar AS. Aortic valve replacement through right thoracotomy. Tex Heart Inst J. 1993;20(4):307–8.

Glauber M, Gilmanov D, Farneti PA et al. Right anterior minithoracotomy for aortic valve replacement: 10-year experience of a single center. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Sep;150(3):548–556.e2.

Brown ML, McKellar SH, Sundt TM, Schaff HV. Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Mar;137(3):670

7.Tabata M, Umakanthan R, Cohn LH et al. Early and late outcomes of 1000 minimally invasive aortic valve opeправая передняя торакотомия ions. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Apr;33(4):537–41.

Raja SG, Navaправая передняя торакотомия narajah M. Impact of minimal access valve surgery on clinical outcomes: current best available evidence. J Card Surg. 2009 Jan–Feb;24(1):73–9.

Brinkman WT, Hoffman W, Dewey TM et al. Aortic valve replacement surgery: comparison of outcomes in matched sternotomy and PORT ACCESS groups. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Jul;90(1):131–5.

Dogan S, Dzemali O, Wimmer-Greinecker G et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a prospective randomized trial. J Heart Valve Dis. 2003 Jan;12(1):76–80.

Bonacchi M, Prifti E, Giunti G, Fправая передняя торакотомия i G, Sani G. Does ministernotomy improve postopeправая передняя торакотомия ive outcome in aortic valve opeправая передняя торакотомия ion? A prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Feb;73(2):460–5. discussion 465–6.

Malaisrie SC, Barnhart GR, Farivar RS et al. Current era minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: techniques and practice. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):6–14.

Navia JL, Cosgrove DM., 3rd. Minimally invasive mitral valve opeправая передняя торакотомия ions. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Nov;62(5):1542–4.

Mohr FW, Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T, van Son JA, Autschbach R. Minimally invasive port-access mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998 Mar;115(3):567–74. discussion 574–6.

Chitwood WR, Jr, Elbeery JR, Chapman WH et al. Video-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: the “micro-mitral” opeправая передняя торакотомия ion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997 Feb;113(2):413–4.

Grossi EA, Galloway AC, Ribakove GH et al. Impact of minimally invasive valvular heart surgery: a case-control study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Mar;71(3):807–10.

Iribarne A, Russo MJ, Easterwood R et al. Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery: a propensity analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Nov;90(5):1471–7. discussion 1477–8.

Kh.G. Khalikulov, A.A. Mansurov, U.B. Akhmedov, O.E. Ilkhomov,S.S. Murtazaev, S.A. Babadjanov //Estimation Of The Results Of Myocardialrevascularization On Beating Heart At The Different Complicated Forms Of Ischemic Heart Disease // Journal Of Critical Reviews // Issn- 2394-5125 Vol 7, Issue 04, 2020 // Pgs 1708-171

Yarbekov R.R., Ilkhomov O.E. "MODERN methods of MINI-INVASIVE TECHNOLOGY in cardiac surgery" Surgery of Uzbekistan No1 / 2024......Pp. 36-41

Downloads

Published

2025-01-31

How to Cite

R. R, Y., & O. E., I. (2025). History of Minimally Invasive Coronary Surgery. International Journal of Integrative and Modern Medicine, 3(1), 267–274. Retrieved from https://medicaljournals.eu/index.php/IJIMM/article/view/1508